“But apparently losing the finals two years ago affects what people think now. “Would I love to win? Yes,” Tatum said at All-Star weekend. Tatum feels that, in part, it’s because of a perception he isn’t quite a winner at the highest level. Nikola Jokic and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander have eye-watering production on bona fide contenders.īarring a drastic shift in discourse or the Celtics going undefeated the rest of the year to secure the best record of all time, it ain’t gonna happen. The primary bucket of MVP candidates tends to be the heliocentric dynamos carrying contenders, if there are any that can outshine the best player on the best team. Presuming the 65-game rule doesn’t take out more candidates, there are a few reasons why Tatum likely won’t overcome his roadblocks to the MVP this year. You’ve really got to watch the games and understand how he has an impact on himself and his teammates.” “So, he’s done it for a long time and I think is underrated in that conversation, and it’s something that, I think he’s doing a great job of reshaping what it means to be the best player. It’s the ability to have sustainable success, the ability to make people around you better and the ability to be great,” Mazzulla said before the Boston Celtics’ 129-112 win over the Chicago Bulls. I mean, I think, one, defining what most valuable means. So does Joe Mazzulla, who may be a tad biased, think Tatum deserves to be MVP? He’s been floating around the top five in voting for the award the past few years. In the juicy narrative void following All-Star weekend, Jayson Tatum suddenly found himself in the center of that debate. CHICAGO - What makes an MVP? How do you balance the value of individual production with narrative and success?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |